Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Additionally to that I needed to switch the order of arguments for the > parallel processing calls, too, to make it compile again. That sounds as if the previous one that was queued did not compile, but I didn't recall seeing such breakage. Also comparison between corresponding patches did not show such a change, either. But perhaps ... > I assume I just did that work twice as the previous version > ought to compile, too. ... means that you didn't need such a switch after all, and the re-sent series didn't have it. I am just making sure that I got the right version in my tree, so please don't behave as if I am accusing you that you advertised that you did more work than you actually did and go defensive ;-) If the reason I didn't see one kind of change in the series I received is because it didn't have to be done and the description mistakenly said that such a change is included, that is perfectly fine. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html