On 13/01/16 09:27, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi Torsten,
>
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2016, Torsten Bögershausen wrote:
>
>> On 01/12/2016 08:57 AM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
>>
>>> +static struct test_data basename_data[] = {
>>> + /* --- POSIX type paths --- */
>>> + { NULL, "." },
>>> + { "", "." },
>>> + { ".", "." },
>>> + { "..", ".." },
>>> + { "/", "/" },
>>> +#if defined(__CYGWIN__) && !defined(NO_LIBGEN_H)
>> Why the !defined(NO_LIBGEN_H)
>>
>> Shouldn't CYGWIN always behave the same ?
>
> One would assume... Alas, it does not.
Err, ... yes it does! :-P
>
> I inherited the code in question and wondered the same. I opted for
> keeping the code as a documentation of the differing behavior.
Exactly.
ATB,
Ramsay Jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html