Re: [PATCH v2] add test to demonstrate that shallow recursive clones fail

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 17.11.2015 um 21:49 schrieb Stefan Beller:
I assumed we'd have yet another flag to activate the new behavior,
but if you want to roll out that new feature as a default, I agree on
needing the fallback.

Ah, I was under the impression that users are surprised by --depth
not propagating into the submodules, so I considered this a bugfix
which doesn't need extra configuration (and the subject line seems
to support my impression ;-).

And if some users really need the old behavior, they can remove the
--recurse-submodules from the clone and issue a submodule update
afterwards (Unless they speak up now and tell us why having --depth
only apply to the superproject is a feature ... ;-).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]