Re: [PATCH v2] add test to demonstrate that shallow recursive clones fail

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:25 PM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Instead of having to search all branches for the requested sha1, we could have
> some sort of data structure to make it not an O(n) operation (n being
> all objects
> in the repo).
>
> Maybe I overestimate the work which needs to be done, because the server has
> bitmaps nowadays.

Quote from [1]

> If we take the kernel history in rev-list and pick two commits that
> are roughly ~10,000 commits apart from one another, JGit can compute
> the rev-list --objects between these two commits in about 120
> milliseconds (git-core should be faster, or at least comparable).

I think we should be fine (note that --objects is a lot heavier than
commit walking). Though.. I just tried it on git.git. 10k commits
(without --objects) take about 200ms with C Git..

[1] http://marc.info/?l=git&m=133374018207891&w=2
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]