Re: [PATCH v6 25/25] refs: break out ref conflict checks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/08/2015 06:03 AM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> [...]
> I can see a few ways that we could make our series even more
> straightforward:
> 
> 1. Leave refs.c in its original location (as suggested by Junio).
>    Optionally, it could be moved at a later date when this area is
>    quiescent.
> [...]

I just tried this (it was less work than expected). It doesn't make the
merge conflict with lf/ref-is-hidden-namespace go away because the
functions in the new refs.c are ordered differently than in the old
refs.c. But it does turn it into a simple rerere-able conflict.

I'll check how much work it would be to make the order of functions in
the new refs.c match that in the old one...

Michael

-- 
Michael Haggerty
mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]