Re: O_NONBLOCK under Windows (was: git.git as of tonight)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/04/2015 12:00 AM, Stefan Beller wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 1:03 PM, Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
The #ifdef assumes that Windows never will have O_NONBLOCK/F_GETFL)

Does the following make more sense ?
#if defined (O_NONBLOCK) && defined (F_GETFL)

Or may be:
#ifndef NO_O_NONBLOCK
>> #ifndef GIT_WINDOWS_NATIVE
>>         int flags = fcntl(fd, F_GETFL);
>>         if (flags < 0)
>>                 warning("Could not get file status flags, "
>>                         "output will be degraded");
>>         else if (fcntl(fd, F_SETFL, flags | O_NONBLOCK))
>> #endif
>>                 warning("Could not set file status flags, "
>>                         "output will be degraded");
>> }
>>
>>
>>
>>   
>>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]