Re: git.git as of tonight

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Am 02.11.2015 um 03:58 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
>> * sb/submodule-parallel-fetch (2015-10-21) 14 commits
>>    (merged to 'next' on 2015-10-23 at 8f04bbd)
>>   + run-command: fix missing output from late callbacks
>>   + test-run-command: increase test coverage
>>   + test-run-command: test for gracefully aborting
>>   + run-command: initialize the shutdown flag
>>   + run-command: clear leftover state from child_process structure
>>   + run-command: fix early shutdown
>>    (merged to 'next' on 2015-10-15 at df63590)
>>   + submodules: allow parallel fetching, add tests and documentation
>>   + fetch_populated_submodules: use new parallel job processing
>>   + run-command: add an asynchronous parallel child processor
>>   + sigchain: add command to pop all common signals
>>   + strbuf: add strbuf_read_once to read without blocking
>>   + xread_nonblock: add functionality to read from fds without blocking
>>   + xread: poll on non blocking fds
>>   + submodule.c: write "Fetching submodule <foo>" to stderr
>>   (this branch is used by rs/daemon-leak-fix and sb/submodule-parallel-update.)
>>
>>   Add a framework to spawn a group of processes in parallel, and use
>>   it to run "git fetch --recurse-submodules" in parallel.
>>
>>   Will merge to 'master'.
>
> Please don't, yet. This series does not build on Windows:
>
> run-command.c: In function 'set_nonblocking':
> run-command.c:1011: error: 'F_GETFL' undeclared (first use in this function)
> run-command.c:1011: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> run-command.c:1011: error: for each function it appears in.)
> run-command.c:1015: error: 'F_SETFL' undeclared (first use in this function)
> run-command.c:1015: error: 'O_NONBLOCK' undeclared (first use in this function)
> make: *** [run-command.o] Error 1

Going by a quick search http://stackoverflow.com/a/22756664
I'd hope we only need to modify the set_nonblocking function using #ifdefs ?

>
> I have to investigate whether we can have some sort of Posixy
> non-blocking IO on Windows or whether we have to opt-out from this
> parallel-process facility. Any help from Windows experts would be
> appreciated.
>
> -- Hannes
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]