Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > Andy Parkins <andyparkins@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Tuesday 2007 March 20 02:55, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: >>> think they are stuck on the fact that you cannot use: >>> >>> git log $new --not --all >> >>> That almost needs a --all-except="refs/heads/a refs/heads/b" option >>> to rev-list. Grrrr. >> >> I'm afraid so. Would a --ignore list be more appropriate? That way you could >> list any refs you wanted (i.e. not just --all) and then have that list >> finally filtered by --ignore. > > Last night on #git Dscho suggested something like: > > git log $new --not '!a' '!b' --all > > as a way to say ignore ref a and ref b when otherwise parsing the > command line arguments. Ugly, very ugly. But is more or less the > same idea you are talking about with the --ignore flag. You mean git log $new --not ^a ^b --all -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html