Andy Parkins <andyparkins@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tuesday 2007 March 20 02:55, Shawn O. Pearce wrote: > > think they are stuck on the fact that you cannot use: > > > > git log $new --not --all > > > That almost needs a --all-except="refs/heads/a refs/heads/b" option > > to rev-list. Grrrr. > > I'm afraid so. Would a --ignore list be more appropriate? That way you could > list any refs you wanted (i.e. not just --all) and then have that list > finally filtered by --ignore. Last night on #git Dscho suggested something like: git log $new --not '!a' '!b' --all as a way to say ignore ref a and ref b when otherwise parsing the command line arguments. Ugly, very ugly. But is more or less the same idea you are talking about with the --ignore flag. -- Shawn. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html