Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] port branch.c to use ref-filter's printing options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> ... While doing so I realized I was moving a lot of code around
> and this had me thinking it's perhaps easier to do the cleaning up
> first as Junio suggested.
> 
> Maybe then it'd be simpler to do implement this rather than move
> code around now and then move code around when we implement the
> parsing methods we spoke about earlier?

When I suggested the approach, I hadn't have done any of what you
actually did, so I was primarily talking out of "hunch" (perhaps
that is what some people call "taste") but I expected something like
that may happen ;-).

Right now, you practically own the topic, in the sense that nobody
seems to be in a very urgent need to compete with you in parallel to
implement what we have discussed before you do, so I personally
would suggest whichever order you feel more comfortable and less
error-prone.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]