Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Matthieu Moy > <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> Not sure this is much of a problem with regards to "--[no-]merged" >>> I mean isn't the square brackets self-explanatory? >> >> Well, usually --no-foo means "cancel the effect of --foo", ie. "git >> command --foo --no-foo" is equivalent to "git command". >> >> Here, --no-merged=some-ref does not _cancel_ the effect but introduce a >> new behavior that was not the default. So it may make sense to explain >> this more clearly. > > maybe we should s/no/not ? makes not sense to me It's too late to rename the option without a transition plan (people's finger and scripts use --no-merged already). But that would be a good idea to introduce --not-merged as a synonym to --no-merged, and deprecate --no-merged (it can remain a deprecated alias forever if needed, but we should promote --not-merged in the docs). -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html