Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] Make "local" orthogonal to date format

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



John Keeping <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> In which case, should we just support it now?
>
> Normally I'd suggest banning controversial options on the basis that
> it's easier in the future to allow something that was previously banned
> than change the meaning of an options, but in this case I can't see any
> other meaning for these options than that described above.

My usual stance is the same as yours, and I agree that there is no
other sane and useful behaviour for "relative-local" to do the same
as "relative".

As we'll go into pre-release feature freeze soonish, we have enough
time to add missing support to the code (the new feature won't have
to make the upcoming 2.6 wait).

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]