Jeff King <peff <at> peff.net> writes:
>>An alternative would be for git stash to always print the name of the stash
>>it is applying.
> Applying refs/stash@{0} (31cb86c3d700d241e315d989f460e3e83f84fa19)
Yes, that's the one.
>Or maybe it would be useful to actually show the stash subject,
That could be nice to see, but is not a substitute for the SHA.
If the stash pop failed because of conflicts then it could even print
To drop this stash manually, run 'git stash drop abcde...'
Another feature I would like to see is a kind of atomic stash apply, where
either the whole change can be applied to the working tree without conflicts,
or nothing happens.
--
Ed Avis <eda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html