On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 12:50:51PM +0000, Ed Avis wrote:
> An alternative would be for git stash to always print the name of the stash
> it is applying. Then you can drop it afterwards by name and be sure you got
> the right one. Printing the name of the stash sounds like a reasonable
> bit of chatter to add anyway, do you agree?
Yeah, I agree that makes sense. We already show something like:
Dropped refs/stash@{0} (31cb86c3d700d241e315d989f460e3e83f84fa19)
when dropping. Perhaps model the message after that:
Applying refs/stash@{0} (31cb86c3d700d241e315d989f460e3e83f84fa19)
Or maybe it would be useful to actually show the stash subject, though
the defaults are not very informative (just "WIP on master", and then
some totally irrelevant commit subject).
-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html