On Friday-201508-07 15:38, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Speaking for myself, I actually like it that the entire metadata is part of the commit object, even the commit message. It makes the whole thing more reliable: one cannot claim that the commit does one thing on one day, and the next day all of a sudden claim that the commit does something completely different. Git's just really consistent the way it is.
Not that I expect anything to change.. but I'd like to point out again
that I wasn't wishlisting "overwrite/replace/demolish the old commit
message". More like a chain (hopefully of length one, but I canot
spll wuth a dam) of the messages, git log then showing the latest of
them, but allowing accessing earlier ones.
Or another way to illustrate my idea: assume a create-once-no-delete
filesystem.
echo 42 > the_answr.txt
Oh, darn it...
ln -s the_answr.txt the_answer.txt
Now both names still point to the content "42\n". The first SHA
would be over ["42\n", "the_answr.txt"] and the second SHA over
["42\n", "the_answer.txt"].
But I get the distinct feeling of beating a poor dead horse here,
so I'll shut up.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html