On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Johan Herland <johan@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Here is where we start to differ. I would say that starting a notes >> merge is completely unrelated to your worktree. Consider this: > > It sounds like what a notes merge really wants is a new linked worktree > that has branch refs/notes/foo checked out: > > * This would allow multiple notes merges to take place at the same time > provided they target different merge references. > > * This would prevent multiple notes merges to the same notes reference > at the same time by the same mechanism that prevents the same branch > from being checked out in two linked worktrees at the same time. > > It's just a thought; I have no idea whether it is practical... > > Michael > That seems far more flexible and robust to me. Regards, Jake -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html