Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] notes: replace pseudorefs with real refs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johan Herland <johan@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Here is where we start to differ. I would say that starting a notes
> merge is completely unrelated to your worktree. Consider this:

It sounds like what a notes merge really wants is a new linked worktree
that has branch refs/notes/foo checked out:

* This would allow multiple notes merges to take place at the same time
provided they target different merge references.

* This would prevent multiple notes merges to the same notes reference
at the same time by the same mechanism that prevents the same branch
from being checked out in two linked worktrees at the same time.

It's just a thought; I have no idea whether it is practical...

Michael

-- 
Michael Haggerty
mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]