On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 15:12 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Jacob Keller <
> > jacob.e.keller@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > From: Jacob Keller <jacob.keller@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > Modify logic of check_refname_component and add a new disposition
> > > regarding "*". Allow refspecs that contain a single "*" if
> > > REFNAME_REFSPEC_PATTERN is set. Change the function to pass the
> > > flags as
> > > a pointer, and clear REFNAME_REFSPEC_PATTERN after the first "*"
> > > so that
> > > only a single "*" is accepted.
> > >
> > > This loosens restrictions on refspecs by allowing patterns that
> > > have
> > > a "*" within a component instead of only as the whole component.
> > > Also
> > > remove the code that hangled refspec patterns in
> > > check_refname_format
> >
> > s/hangled/handled/
> > ...
>
> Thanks; here is what I queued yesterday.
>
Woah. I bow to your imperative commit message abilities. The new commit
message is very nicely worded. Thanks for taking the time to reword my
jumble correctly.
Everything looked great to me.
Regards,
Jake��.n��������+%������w��{.n��������n�r������&��z�ޗ�zf���h���~����������_��+v���)ߣ�