On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 2:56 AM, Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I guess if you can have multiple arguments after ':' in an atom, then >> you have wiggle room for future. But it looks like you only accept one >> argument after ':'.. (I only checked the version on 'pu'). Having an >> "alignment atom" to augment the real one (like %< changes the behavior >> of the next placeholder), could also work, but it adds dependency >> between atoms, something I don't think ref-filter.c is ready for. >> > > I was thinking of something on the lines of having a function which right > before printing checks if any "align" option is given to the end of a given > item and aligns it accordingly, this ensures that any item which needs to > have such an option can easily do so. > > https://github.com/KarthikNayak/git/commit/0284320483d6442a6425fc665e740f9f975654a1 > > This is what I came up with, you could have a look and let me know if > you have any > suggestions. Yeah, pretty close to what I described in the other mail. Now if you make "align" a separate atom, I think it would reduce clutter in populate_value() (my personal opinion is this function looks too messy already) and we can easily add more alignment options in future :) -- Duy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html