Re: [PATCH v4 04/44] builtin-am: implement patch queue mechanism

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> (optional nit, bikeshedding)
> In conjunction with the previous patch I just wonder when we put a
> TODO and when we want to put a NEEDSWORK, or if we're being
> inconsistent here as both issues will be resolved in a later patch
> in the series.

That's a code style thing that I don't personally have a strong opinion about.

Not sure if the following means anything, but on master,

git grep '\bTODO\b' | wc -l
102

git grep '\bNEEDSWORK\b' | wc -l
45

git log -G'\bTODO\b --oneline | wc -l
185

git log -G'\bNEEDSWORK\b' --oneline | wc -l
120

So it does seem that temporary stuff is usually tagged with
"NEEDSWORK", rather than "TODO".

Anyway, it's probably better to be consistent, so I will switch to "NEEDSWORK".

Thanks,
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]