Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] test-lib.sh: fix color support when tput needs ~/.terminfo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 05:11:21PM -0400, Richard Hansen wrote:
>
>> +		test -z "$1" && test -n "$quiet" && return
>> +		eval "say_color_color=\$say_color_$1"
>
> Thanks, this looks much simpler.
>
> In the non-quiet case, you will eval $say_color_, even though we know it
> to be bogus.

Yeah, but there is this gem in this patch:

+	...
+	say_color_info=$(tput setaf 6) # cyan
+	say_color_reset=$(tput sgr0)
+	say_color_="" # no formatting for normal text

In other words, the patch handles these two in the same mechanism:

	say_color error "this is my error message"
	say_color "" "ok this is just a regular message"

and treating an empy string just one of the supported "colors",
i.e. "error", "skip", "warn", "pass", "info" "reset" and "" are the
colors.

> I guess we need to make sure say_color_color is blank,
> though. The alternative would be:
>
>   if test -z "$1"; then
>     test -n "$quiet" && return
>     say_color_color=
>   else
>     eval "say_color_color=\$say_color_$1"
>   fi
>
> I dunno if that makes the intent more clear or not. I am OK with it
> either way.

I am OK with it either way, too.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]