Richard Hansen <rhansen@xxxxxxx> writes:
> We could test if the variable is set first (test -n "${foo+set}"), at
> the cost of a bit more complexity.
>
>> I do not mind it so much as you have
>> it, but it does mean adding a new field needs to update two spots.
>
> I also don't like the duplicate list of color types, and I considered
> doing something similar to what you suggested, but I decided against it.
> I'm a bit worried about bizarre syntax errors or code execution if
> say_color() is used improperly. ('eval' with uncontrolled variables
> makes me nervous.)
I originally had the same reaction to your use of `eval` (with or
without being guarded by the case to limit to known 5 ones). But
the uncontrolled-ness of this use of eval is to the same degree of
uncontrolled-ness of any test_expect_{success,failure} scriptlet,
so...
I like this "save to variables instead of using tput" approach very
much either way. Well done.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html