On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:47 PM, Philippe De Muyter <phdm@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 09:01:10AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Philippe De Muyter <phdm@xxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > Trying to understand, I have eventually done "git log" on my branch and >> > on v3.15 with the following commands : >> > >> > git log v3.15 --full-history --decorate=short | grep '^commit' > /tmp/3.15.commits >> > git log --full-history --decorate=short | grep '^commit' > /tmp/mybranch.commits >> >> Either >> >> git log --oneline v3.15..HEAD ;# show what I have not in theirs >> >> or >> >> gitk v3.15...HEAD ;# show our differences graphically > > This shows the commits in my branch starting from the most recent common point, > thus my commits, but I see differences in the files not explained by my commits, > but by the fact that many older commits (between v3.13 and v3.14) are missing on > my branch, but still in both branches I have a commit called v3.14 with the > same hash. Is that normal ? As this is the linux kernel, maybe everything you are working on is open source and you can push it to a public git hosting service (like GitHub, BitBucket, ...), so people can have a look there or clone it from there? (And if you do that it would help when talking about differences in some files, if you could tell which files and which commits, and maybe also which git commands you used.) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html