On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 09:01:10AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Philippe De Muyter <phdm@xxxxxxx> writes: > > > Trying to understand, I have eventually done "git log" on my branch and > > on v3.15 with the following commands : > > > > git log v3.15 --full-history --decorate=short | grep '^commit' > /tmp/3.15.commits > > git log --full-history --decorate=short | grep '^commit' > /tmp/mybranch.commits > > Either > > git log --oneline v3.15..HEAD ;# show what I have not in theirs > > or > > gitk v3.15...HEAD ;# show our differences graphically This shows the commits in my branch starting from the most recent common point, thus my commits, but I see differences in the files not explained by my commits, but by the fact that many older commits (between v3.13 and v3.14) are missing on my branch, but still in both branches I have a commit called v3.14 with the same hash. Is that normal ? Philippe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html