Re: [PATCH v2 01/18] t1404: new tests of ref D/F conflicts within transactions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> But there is a i18n markings test, for which test-i18ngrep was invented for.
>
> Thanks for the info. I wasn't aware of that facility.
>
> So if I understand correctly, s/grep/test_i18ngrep/ will address your
> concern? That's fine with me.

Thinking about it again, should these messages ever be translated,
or are they plumbing messages that should never get translated?

If the latter, then 'grep' is the right thing to do; in fact, it
would be a bug in the test if we used test_i18ngrep.

	Side note: besides, I think gettext-poison tests have bitrot
	and are no longer very useful (if they ever were, that is).

> In any case I'll be away for a 4-day weekend so it will have to wait
> until Monday.

Enjoy your long weekend ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]