On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 11:41:51PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Mike Hommey <mh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Note the most important part is actually between the parens: that only > > happens when the remote helper returns '?' to the `list` command, which > > non-git remotes helpers (like git-remote-hg or git-remote-bzr) do. > > git-remote-testgit also does, so if you only apply the test parts of the > > patch, you'll see that the test fails. > > > > remote-curl probably doesn't hit the problem because it's not returning > > '?' to `list`. > > Hmm, that suggests that the new codepath should be taken only when > the remote helper says '?' (does it mean "I dunno"? where are these > documented, by the way?) in Documentation/gitremote-helpers.txt > , yes? It wasn't immediately obvious from > the patch text that it was the case. The patch changes the behavior in all cases, because it didn't feel necessary to have a different behavior between the "normal" case and the '?' case: it makes sense to request the ref being pointed at than the symbolic ref in every case. Moreover, this makes existing non-git remote-helpers work without having to modify them to provide a refspec for HEAD (none of the 5 mercurial remote-helpers I checked do). The paragraph before last in the commit message mentioned this in maybe not very clear terms. Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html