Re: [PATCH v3] pkt-line: allow writing of LARGE_PACKET_MAX buffers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 3:36 AM, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Below is a another iteration on the patch. The actual code changes are
>> the same as the strbuf one, but the tests take care to avoid assuming
>> the filesystem can handle such a long path. Testing on Windows and OS X
>> is appreciated.
>
> All three new tests fail on OS X. Thus far brief examination of the
> first failing tests shows that 'expect' and 'actual' differ:
>
> expect:
>     long
>     master
>
> actual:
>     master

The failure manifests as soon as the refname hits length 1024, at
which point for-each-ref stops reporting it. MAX_PATH on OS X is 1024,
so some part of the machinery invoked by for-each-ref likely is
rejecting refnames longer than that (even when coming from
packed-refs).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]