Re: [PATCH v3] pkt-line: allow writing of LARGE_PACKET_MAX buffers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:34 AM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Below is a another iteration on the patch. The actual code changes are
> the same as the strbuf one, but the tests take care to avoid assuming
> the filesystem can handle such a long path. Testing on Windows and OS X
> is appreciated.

All three new tests fail on OS X. Thus far brief examination of the
first failing tests shows that 'expect' and 'actual' differ:

expect:
    long
    master

actual:
    master

> Note that in addition to cheating on the creation of the long ref, I had
> to tweak the fetch test a little to avoid writing the loose ref there,
> too. That makes the test a little weaker (it is not as "end to end",
> checking that all parts of fetch can handle it), but it does check the
> thing we are changing here, that the protocol code can handle it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]