Re: [PATCH v3 00/14] ref-transactions-reflog

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> I also have some thoughts about how those operations can be
> implemented without such a performance hit (reading the whole
> reflog into memory as part of the transaction seems problematic to
> me), but that should probably wait for a separate message (and
> I've talked about it a bit in person).

Perhaps iterator interface such as for_each_reflog_ent() would help?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]