Re: strange date generated by git-format-patch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 08:08:39AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:

> The only potential problem with it is that some MUA's (like mutt for
> example) sort by the From date by default.  You can force it to list
> the patches in an unsorted order (via 'Ou'), but it might be nice if

That's not true; mutt sorts by date by default, but it pulls the default
from the "Date" header, which git correctly sets to the author timestamp.
You can convince mutt to look at the date in the 'From' line using a
'date-received' sort, but I don't know that it was ever the default.

-Peff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]