Re: [PATCH 2/2] pretty: add %D format specifier

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Harry Jeffery <harry@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 11/09/14 17:56, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Because patch 1/2 alone does not make much sense without 2/2, it
>> probably would have been better to do these as a single patch.
>
> Would you like me to resubmit it as a single patch, or are you
> applying them as is?
>
>> And of course a few additional tests to t4205 would not hurt ;-)
>
> Sure. Should the tests be in the same patch, or a subsequent one?

All in one; that way, "git show $that_single_patch" later can become
more useful by demonstrating expected uses in its test.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]