Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] combine-diff: do not pass revs->dense_combined_merges redundantly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 08.09.2014 um 19:29 schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Thomas Rast <tr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

The existing code passed revs->dense_combined_merges along revs itself
into the combine-diff functions, which is rather redundant.  Remove
the 'dense' argument until much further down the callchain to simplify
callers.

It was not apparent that the changes to diff_tree_combined_merge()
was correct without looking at both of its callsites, but one passes
the .dense_combined_merges member, and the other in submodules
always gives true, which you covered here:

Note that while the caller in submodule.c needs to do extra work now,
the next commit will simplify this to a single setting again.

diff --git a/submodule.c b/submodule.c
index c3a61e7..0499de6 100644
--- a/submodule.c
+++ b/submodule.c
@@ -482,10 +482,13 @@ static void find_unpushed_submodule_commits(struct commit *commit,
  	struct rev_info rev;

  	init_revisions(&rev, NULL);
+	rev.ignore_merges = 0;
+	rev.combined_merges = 1;
+	rev.dense_combined_merges = 1;
  	rev.diffopt.output_format |= DIFF_FORMAT_CALLBACK;
  	rev.diffopt.format_callback = collect_submodules_from_diff;
  	rev.diffopt.format_callback_data = needs_pushing;
-	diff_tree_combined_merge(commit, 1, &rev);
+	diff_tree_combined_merge(commit, &rev);
  }

I briefly wondered if there can be any unwanted side effects in this
particular codepath that is caused by setting rev.combined_merges
which was not set in the original code, but seeing that this &rev is
not used for anything other than diff_tree_combined_merge(), it
should be OK.

Also I wondered if this is leaking whatever in the &rev structure,
but in this call I think rev is used only for its embedded diffopt
in a way that does not leak anything, so it seems to be OK, but I'd
appreciate if submodule folks can double check.

The only thing the collect_submodules_from_diff() callback does
is to collect the to-be-pushed submodules in the needs_pushing
string_list initialized with STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP which is cleared
at the end of push_unpushed_submodules(), so I think we should be
ok here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]