Re: [PATCH 02/11] http-backend.c: replace `git_config()` with `git_config_get_bool()` family

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tanay Abhra <tanayabh@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 8/5/2014 12:29 AM, Eric Sunshine wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Tanay Abhra <tanayabh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> -       if (skip_prefix(var, "http.", &p)) {
>>> -               int i;
>>> -
>>> -               for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rpc_service); i++) {
>>> -                       struct rpc_service *svc = &rpc_service[i];
>>> -                       if (!strcmp(p, svc->config_name)) {
>>> -                               svc->enabled = git_config_bool(var, value);
>>> -                               return 0;
>>> -                       }
>>> -               }
>>> +       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rpc_service); i++) {
>>> +               struct rpc_service *svc = &rpc_service[i];
>>> +               strbuf_addf(&var, "http.%s", svc->config_name);
>>> +               if (!git_config_get_bool(var.buf, &value))
>>> +                       svc->enabled = value;
>>> +               strbuf_reset(&var);
>>>         }
>> 
>> There is a behavior change here. The original code set svc->enabled to
>> the first matching rpc_service[] entry, whereas the new code sets it
>> to the last matching entry. Is this change intentional?
>>
>
> I was preparing the reroll and I saw that I had missed your mail.
> I think that I haven't changed the behaviour, the original one is
> written in callback form so it has to go through the array every time for each
> new value.
> When there are multiple entries for a service say,
>
> http.receivepack = 1
> http.receivepack = 0

I first got convinced by Eric, but I now think you're right.

Eric's point was (I think) not about multiple entries for the same
variable, but about multiple entries for different services, like

http.receivepack = 1
http.uploadpack = 0

The order of assignments to svn->enabled change, but it doesn't matter
because svc is just a local variable pointing to the right element of
rpc_service[i]. So in both cases, you'll assign

rpc_service[<index of service>].enabled = <last occurence of variable http.<service> >

even though the order of assignments will change.

Eric, am I interpreting right?

-- 
Matthieu Moy
http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]