On Wed, 2014-07-16 at 10:59 -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 19:42 -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 04:32:59PM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote:
> >>
> >> > +static void error_bad_sort_config(const char *err, va_list params)
> >> > +{
> >> > + vreportf("warning: tag.sort has ", err, params);
> >> > +}
> >>
> >> This feels a little like an abuse of the "prefix" field of vreportf, but
> >> as you probably saw in my "for fun" patch, doing it right means
> >> formatting into a buffer and then reformatting that (which we're
> >> already doing again in vreportf, but less flexibly). I dunno.
> >>
> >> At any rate, this should be marked for translation, no?
> >>
> >> -Peff
> >
> > Oh, yes it probably should. It's definitely a little bit abusive of the
> > prefix field, but that seemed easier.
>
> And i18n would automatically mean this will not work, no? There is
> no guarantee that the translation of "warning: " will be followed
> directly by the translation of "tag.sort has" without any words from
> variable part in all languages.
>
> After all, it seems to me that the one in
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/253346
>
> struck the right balance among various abuses; let's use the error
> reporter from that version, instead of going down this rabbit hole.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
So is that patch series version acceptable then? Or should I spin one
again that is in that vein?
Thanks,
Jake
��.n��������+%������w��{.n��������n�r������&��z�ޗ�zf���h���~����������_��+v���)ߣ�