Am 30.06.2014 16:22, schrieb Jeff King:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 08:59:53PM +0700, Duy Nguyen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
diff --git a/sha1_file.c b/sha1_file.c
index 394fa45..8adab14 100644
--- a/sha1_file.c
+++ b/sha1_file.c
@@ -1207,7 +1207,8 @@ static void prepare_packed_git_one(char *objdir, int local)
if (has_extension(de->d_name, ".idx")) {
/* Don't reopen a pack we already have. */
If we don't follow my suggestion above, we still have this
has_extension. This is a reimplementation of ends_with, isn't it? We can
probably drop it and just use ends_with.
This calls for another patch if we just want to kill has_extension()
in favor of ends_with(). There are 12 call sites of it.
Yes. Some of those would want to become ends_with, and some would
actually want to become strip_suffix. I'm working up a series now.
NB: has_extension is almost the same as ends_with, but it also checks if
the string is longer than just the extension:
ends_with("x", "x") => 1
has_extension("x", "x") => 0
René
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html