Re: Our merge bases sometimes suck

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



W dniu 2014-06-20 23:17, Nico Williams pisze:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 1:53 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
[...]

Hmph, but that obviously will become very expensive to compute as
project grows.

That's the main reason to like Fossil's approach (namely, the use of
SQL, specifically SQLite3): you can write declarative queries and let
the query planner optimize.

I do wonder if using *generic* RDBMS / key-value store would really
make Git faster than current filesystem-like approach.

BTW. perhaps caching generation numbers would help here; the idea
of adding performance-helper generation number header to commit
object was rejected.

(That's also about the only thing I like about Fossil: the use of
SQL/SQLite3, and all that that implies.  Fossil is otherwise an
anti-git, and that makes it useless for me.)

There are Bazaar and Veracity that are supposed to have pluggable
backends...

--
Jakub Narębski

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]