Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] replace signal() with sigaction()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 12:05:29PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> >> Jeremiah Mahler (9):
> >>   compat/mingw.c: expand MinGW support for sigaction
> >>   connect.c: replace signal() with sigaction()
> >>   progress.c: replace signal() with sigaction()
> >>   write_or_die.c: replace signal() with sigaction()
> >>   daemon.c: replace signal() with sigaction()
> >>   builtin/log.c: replace signal() with sigaction()
> >>   builtin/merge-index.c: replace signal() with sigaction()
> >>   builtin/verify-tag.c: replace signal() with sigaction()
> >>   sigchain.c: replace signal() with sigaction()
> >
> > The series without patch 9/9 works on Windows so far.
> >
> > Without patch patch 9/9 and a more complete implementation of sigaction in
> > compat/mingw.c the series misses its goal. But even if you complete it, it
> > is IMHO only code churn without practical merits.
> 
> Hmm, you sound a bit harsher than you usually do---although I
> sort of share with you the doubt on the practical merits.
> 

Alright, I'm dropping it.  Too much work for no real gain other than
some piece of mind.

Thanks Johannes and Junio for your feedback.

-- 
Jeremiah Mahler
jmmahler@xxxxxxxxx
http://github.com/jmahler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]