Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] replace signal() with sigaction()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Jeremiah Mahler (9):
>>   compat/mingw.c: expand MinGW support for sigaction
>>   connect.c: replace signal() with sigaction()
>>   progress.c: replace signal() with sigaction()
>>   write_or_die.c: replace signal() with sigaction()
>>   daemon.c: replace signal() with sigaction()
>>   builtin/log.c: replace signal() with sigaction()
>>   builtin/merge-index.c: replace signal() with sigaction()
>>   builtin/verify-tag.c: replace signal() with sigaction()
>>   sigchain.c: replace signal() with sigaction()
>
> The series without patch 9/9 works on Windows so far.
>
> Without patch patch 9/9 and a more complete implementation of sigaction in
> compat/mingw.c the series misses its goal. But even if you complete it, it
> is IMHO only code churn without practical merits.

Hmm, you sound a bit harsher than you usually do---although I
sort of share with you the doubt on the practical merits.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]