Junio C Hamano wrote: > Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Junio C Hamano wrote: > > ... > >> I was originally led to believe that its code quality was good > >> enough, and that was why I merged the bottom three patches of the > >> series even down to 'next' in the first place. But after seeing the > >> "Of course" response that led to [*1*], which made me recall many > >> patch-review interactions with him, I have started to have doubts. > > > > This is bullshit, and a wrong direction fallacy. > > > > Event #1: > > Junio rejects the graduation > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/248263 > > > > Event #2: > > I give up improving remote helpers in git.git > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/248063/focus=248341 > > > > Junio is trying to make you believe that his decision (#1) was caused by > > something I did (#2). Don't fall into that trap, #2 happened *AFTER* #1, > > it can't possibly be the cause. > > I think you misunderstood. > > I never said that I do not want it to graduate up (out is an option) > based on code quality. Fair enough, that was my understanding up until today. > But because I was asked, I thought about it, and then answered > honestly. I do not know what a trap you perceive is about, and I am > not interested in your responses. Philippe Vaucher didn't ask about quality, he asked about moving out of contrib. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html