Re: [PATCH 1/3] Revert "make error()'s constant return value more visible"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King wrote:
> On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 01:14:43AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > Jeff King wrote:

> > > You could try reading the commit message of the commit you are
> > > reverting, which explains it, but the short answer is: try compiling
> > > with -O3.
> > 
> > Sigh. And I'm the one with the abrasive style of communication.
> 
> I apologize if that seemed abrasive. I am slightly annoyed that you
> seemed to be reverting my commit without understanding (or dealing with)
> the problem that the original fixed.

The original problem happens only with -O3, I tried only with -O2 and
didn't see any problems.

If we have a) code that fixes a couple warnings with -O3 but introduces
hundreds with -O2, vs. b) code that has only a comple warnings with -O3,
I'd go for b) any day.

> But I was _also_ trying to point you in the right direction by directing
> you to -O3. Do you see the problem now?  And did you look at the
> follow-up patch I sent?

Yes, I see the problem now with -O3. And yes, I looked at the patch you
sent. I haven't tested it but I bet it would sove both problems.

Cheers.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]