Jeff King wrote: > On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 12:45:30AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > > Jeff King wrote: > > > On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 01:12:53AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote: > > > > > > > So it looks like gcc is smarter now, and in trying to fix a few warnings > > > > we generated hundreds more. > > > > > > > > This reverts commit e208f9cc7574f5980faba498d0aa30b4defeb34f. > > > > > > And now we've gone the other way, and re-enabled the initial warnings. > > > Can we come up with a solution that helps both cases? > > > > What initial warnings? As I explained already I don't get any warnings > > with this patch series in gcc 4.9.0. > > The "few warnings" in your statement quoted above. > > You could try reading the commit message of the commit you are > reverting, which explains it, but the short answer is: try compiling > with -O3. Sigh. And I'm the one with the abrasive style of communication. -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html