On 4 May 2014 19:51:09 GMT+10:00, Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >James Denholm wrote: >> Felipe Contreras wrote: >> >David Lang wrote: >> >> the vast majority of people here do not take that attitude. >> > >> >It's actually the exact opposite. I don't care what is the track >record >> >of the people in the discussion. >> >> Ah, yes, like that discussion we once had where you totally didn't >run >> `git log | grep James Denholm` at one point to demonstrate that I had >> not yet made any contributions,instead of actually engaging in >> discussion. Oh, wait. > >You mean this thread[1] in which I sent 14 mails directly to you? Yeah, >I din't engage in that discussion at all! Yeah, you didn't. Instead you danced, but I guess it's really all said and done now so eh, have your point. >> >If their argument is good, their argument is good. >> >> The problem, though, is that time and time again you've shown that >you >> value your own arguments to the exclusion of all others. You can't >> tell if someone else's argument is good, because it runs against >> yours, and yours must be right because you hold it. > >I can show you evidence of how that's a blatant lie. Just two days ago >I >changed my mind because somebody provided a good argument. And I can show you evidence of you being indiscourseable on the topic of your pet proposals, but I won't, because you're indiscourseable on the meta similarly. >But I'm not going to bother any more with you, you are just spreading >lies and tainting the discussion. Well, maybe we'll see what other folks think. Regards, James Denholm. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html