James Denholm wrote: > Felipe Contreras wrote: > >David Lang wrote: > >> the vast majority of people here do not take that attitude. > > > >It's actually the exact opposite. I don't care what is the track record > >of the people in the discussion. > > Ah, yes, like that discussion we once had where you totally didn't run > `git log | grep James Denholm` at one point to demonstrate that I had > not yet made any contributions,instead of actually engaging in > discussion. Oh, wait. You mean this thread[1] in which I sent 14 mails directly to you? Yeah, I din't engage in that discussion at all! And the point I was making is that if I manage to show the community was wrong in some thing (as you claimed), that community wouldn't include you. > >If their argument is good, their argument is good. > > The problem, though, is that time and time again you've shown that you > value your own arguments to the exclusion of all others. You can't > tell if someone else's argument is good, because it runs against > yours, and yours must be right because you hold it. I can show you evidence of how that's a blatant lie. Just two days ago I changed my mind because somebody provided a good argument. But I'm not going to bother any more with you, you are just spreading lies and tainting the discussion. [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/247188/focus=247584 -- Felipe Contreras -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html