Re: What is missing from Git v2.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 03:23:54AM -0500, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> > 
> > There is evidence for the claim that there won't be those problems. You have
> > absolutely no evidence there there will.
> 
> It's clear that you've not been able to produce evidence that can
> convince most of the people on this thread.

Which only proves you don't want to be convinced, no evidence could convince
you.

> I don't even think we need to query the user to fill out all of the
> fields.  We can prepopulate a lot of the fields (name, e-mail address,
> etc.) from OS specific defaults that are available on most systems ---
> specifically, the default values we would use the name and e-mail
> address are not specified in a config file.

Most systems don't have a configured $EMAIL, so those defautls would be wrong.

It's so evident that no evide could convince you that you don't even bothere to
answer my question:

Why does Mercurial, Bazaar, Subversion, CVS, and pretty much everything uses
aliases?

Since you are conveniently not answering, I'll answer for you:

Because such hypothetical problems wouldn't actually occur in reality with Git,
just like they don't occur in other tools.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]