Re: What is missing from Git v2.0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Kastrup wrote:
> Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > James Denholm wrote:
> >> Felipe Contreras wrote:
> >> >This is a false dichotomy; there aren't just two kinds
> >> > of Git users.
> >> >
> >> > There is such a category of Git users who are not
> >> > fresh-out-of-the-boat, yet not power users either.
> >> 
> >> Oh, I didn't mean to suggest a dichotomy of any kind. However these are the
> >> two groups (I suggest) are the most immediately relevant - one calls for
> >> change, and the other would be negatively impacted.
> >
> > Nobody would be negatively impacted. Who would be impacted negatively
> > by having default aliases?
> 
> The people having to read and understand scripts written in the
> expectation of default aliases.

Which are imaginary.

> > And I have showed they are not problems.
> 
> You managed to convince yourself, so feel free to put aliases in every
> Git you use and distribute.

There is evidence for the claim that there won't be those problems. You have
absolutely no evidence there there will.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]