Re: [PATCH v3 19/27] refs: add a concept of a reference transaction

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Haggerty <mhagger@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> In retrospect, you might have been objecting more to the misleading
> docstring than to the behavior as implemented at the time.  

Yeah, I was reacting to the comment that said create can delete ;-)

> The
> docstring implied that create could actually be used to delete a
> reference, but that was not true: it always checked that the reference
> didn't exist beforehand.  So at worst it could leave a non-existent
> reference un-created.

OK, all is clear then.  

>>  (2) keep the assert(), reject such user input at the callers, and
>>      document that these are invalid inputs;
>
> The current status in v3 is that (2) is implemented.

Good.  Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]