Re: [PATCH 03/10] t4018: an infrastructure to test hunk headers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 05:36:59PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:

> > +How to write RIGHT test cases
> > +=============================
> > +
> > +Insert the word "ChangeMe" (exactly this form) at a distance of
> > +at least two lines from the line that must appear in the hunk header.
> 
> The existing tests use -U1 to make writing cases simpler. Is there a
> reason not to continue that (or if you found that porting the existing
> cases was not a chore with -U3, I can buy that argument, too)?

I take it back. You did keep "-U1" in the result. Is this "two lines"
rule necessary, then?

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]