Re: [PATCH 13/26] update-ref --stdin: Simplify error messages for missing oldvalues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/10/2014 08:46 AM, Michael Haggerty wrote:
> Instead of, for example,
> 
>     fatal: update refs/heads/master missing [<oldvalue>] NUL
> 
> emit
> 
>     fatal: update refs/heads/master missing <oldvalue>
[snip]
> -		die("update %s missing [<oldvalue>] NUL", update->ref_name);
> +		die("update %s missing <oldvalue>", update->ref_name);

The reason for the original wording is that the <oldvalue> is indeed
optional.  This can only occur at end-of-input, and it is actually the
*NUL* that is missing because an empty old value can be specified to
mean that it it intentionally missing.

-Brad

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]