On 03/10/2014 01:08 PM, Brad King wrote:
>> - die("update %s missing [<oldvalue>] NUL", update->ref_name);
>> + die("update %s missing <oldvalue>", update->ref_name);
>
> The reason for the original wording is that the <oldvalue> is indeed
> optional. This can only occur at end-of-input, and it is actually the
> *NUL* that is missing because an empty old value can be specified to
> mean that it it intentionally missing.
I see a following patch makes the wording even clearer about
unexpected end of input, so ignore my previous review.
-Brad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html