Re: [PATCH v2] implemented strbuf_write_or_die()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Faiz Kothari <faiz.off93@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Implementing this clearly distinguishes between writing a normal buffer
>> and writing a strbuf. Also, it provides an interface to write strbuf
>> directly without knowing the private members of strbuf, making strbuf
>> completely opaque. Also, makes the code more readable.
>
> These three sentences which justify the change should go above the
> "---" line so they are recorded in the project history for future
> readers to understand why the change was made. As for their actual
> value, the first and third sentences are nebulous; the second sentence
> may be suitable (although strbuf's buf and len are actually considered
> public, so the justification not be supportable).

...justification *may* not be...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]